| Pages: [1] |
1. Cloaked bombers and assaultships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Was thinking about that, and how about making this cloak penetrable with you directional scanner. Just give the AF a bonus to that.
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 13:54:00
|
2. Cloaked bombers and assaultships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You made 2 arguments, none of them have convinced me to drop this idea. The first is that AF allready have a role and perform it well. This true, but there is no rule that sais that every ship just needs one role to perform. Why shouldnt AF's be...
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 13:49:00
|
3. Cloaked bombers and assaultships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
True, however the assaultship is not. The idea of this mechanic is introducing the "cat and mouse" play into big fleetfights, witch usually are pretty static. Assaultships are verry good at this sort of thing.
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 13:18:00
|
4. Cloaked bombers and assaultships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Its a buff, not a nerf m8. Id say, it makes it more exiting this way
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 12:59:00
|
5. High Sec incursions payout adjustment - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
-1 Incursion are dangerous and competition can be feirce. It requires well fitted ships in a fleet with good members and a seasoned fc. In contrast, lvl 4 missions can be done afk.
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 12:44:00
|
6. Cloaked bombers and assaultships - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Recently our devs have been working on making smaller ships more usefull, so was thinking and came up with an idea. How about giving stealth bombers a new type of cloaking device. This mod gives them the ability to stay cloaked while firing bombs...
- by Red Revolver - at 2012.03.21 12:27:00
|
7. Local in Jita - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
in amsterdam 99% the coke you buy on the strreet is fake. so id say its just realistic
- by Red Revolver - at 2009.09.01 14:19:00
|
8. Stardrive, certificates and Dust dependency - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
how about this then: You give the solar scanners a range of like 1 lightyear. That way you can only probe out solar systems in the same constellation. When you activate the stardrive it would take about two weeks to get on the other side. It would...
- by Red Revolver - at 2009.08.30 15:17:00
|
9. Stardrive, certificates and Dust dependency - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
A few ideas Probe out and travel to nearby solar systems in WH Space: -Start drive -Solar scanners -Star gate Construction (an egg in witch you can deposit the required resources, like an outpost) -Maybe even give WH space sov (Fun but not neces...
- by Red Revolver - at 2009.08.29 23:11:00
|
10. The Future Of Epic Arc - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Here are a few ideas for the future of epic arc missions. - Tie arcs into factional warfare by giving a mission to kill a high ranking factional guy/girl - Give choices during the mission wich will result in standingsgain/loss with the faction o...
- by Red Revolver - at 2009.06.11 16:25:00
|
11. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Red Revolver on 21/11/2008 18:10:32 a fighter is 5000m3, that is as big as a frigate, as for server problems, it would be taxing indeed, but it would also attract a whole new group of people.
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 18:08:00
|
12. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
well, not exactly, you would need to exit the fighter, in your pod, in order to leave the battle
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 17:22:00
|
13. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The reason I would choose to fly a fighter, instead of a regular ship is that it gives the game a new dimention and the "in space" feeling would be more real. Coordinating attacks would be more than just using a web/scram and blowing up the bigges...
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 13:35:00
|
14. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The fighter class ships are not all thet different from the fighter drones. They need bandwith to fly and are not equpped with a warpdrive. When abbandoned you would need to exit in your pod to escape the battlescene.
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 13:34:00
|
15. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As I said, the fighters need bandwith, so that meens that only a carrier or mothership (maybe only motherships) can be the home of a fighter squadron. There, the ships can be fitted like frigates. However there are a few mayor differences. Because...
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 13:34:00
|
16. Fighter class vessle - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Red Revolver on 21/11/2008 13:42:16 Edited by: Red Revolver on 21/11/2008 13:33:19 The idea came to me because i was (in the beginning) a bit disappointed about the flight control of ships. As a kid I was playing X-Wing vs. Tie ...
- by Red Revolver - at 2008.11.21 13:32:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |